Isolocity Pricing Overview

edit

Free Trial

Annual Contract

$159.00

1 Full user Per Month

Monthly Contract

$199.00

1 Full User Per Month

Enterprise

Per Month

Our pricing is straightforward:

Annual Contract:

Full User: $159/month
Mid-Level User: $29/month
Basic User: Free

Month-to-Month Contract:

Full User: $199/month
Mid-Level User: $29/month
Basic User: Free

There are no setup fees, and training, support, and SOPs are included. We offer a 20% discount for annual contracts. As the number of full users increases, the cost per user decreases—potentially as low as $100/full user/month for annual contracts and $117/full user/month for month-to-month contracts.

For inventory add-ons, we charge $29/full user/month, and for inventory cost add-ons, it's $79/full user/month.

Isolocity has 3 pricing editions. A free trial of Isolocity is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and see what edition and features meet your budget and needs.

Pricing information for Isolocity is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Isolocity must be conducted with the seller.

We offer a special flat fee for enterprise clients with more than 30 full users.

Pricing information was last updated on October 10, 2024

Download complete pricing listDownload now

Top-Rated Alternatives

MasterControl Quality Management System

4.3/5

(504)

View All Alternatives

Isolocity Pricing Reviews

(1)

Krishna A.

Head of Quality Assurance

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

4/9/2026

"Effective Quality Events and Reliable Document Control"

5/5

What do you like best about Isolocity?

The Quality Events module is very effective for managing complaints, non-conformances, and corrective actions. The 5 Whys and fishbone tools make root cause analysis simple. Document Control with revision and change management is also very reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Isolocity?

The Equipment Management module could be improved. While issues can be recorded in the discussion section, it is not very clear or easy to track. A more structured and visible way to log breakdowns and improvements would make it much more useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.